CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
KAREN MEYERS, as Administratrix of the Estate on behalf of Gabriel Taye; CORNELIA REYNOLDS; BENYAM TAYE,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CINCINNATI BOARD OF EDUCATION; MARY RONAN, In her Official Capacity as Superintendent of Cincinnati Public Schools,
Defendants,

RUTHENIA JACKSON, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Principal of Carson Elementary School; JEFFREY MCKENZIE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Principal of Carson Elementary School,
Defendants-Appellants.
   No. 18-3974
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati.
No. 1:17-cv-00521—Timothy S. Black, District Judge.
Argued: December 4, 2019
Decided and Filed: December 29, 2020
Before: GRIFFIN, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. This civil rights action arises from the death of eight-year-old Gabriel Taye, who died by suicide on January 26, 2017. Taye was a third-grade student at Carson Elementary School, part of the Cincinnati Public Schools (“CPS”) system in Cincinnati, Ohio. The plaintiffs-appellees (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”)—Karen Meyers (as Administratrix of the Estate of Gabriel Taye) and Taye’s parents, Cornelia Reynolds and Benyam Taye—filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Cincinnati Board of Education (“the Board”); now-retired Cincinnati Public Schools Superintendent Mary Ronan; former Carson Elementary principal, Ruthenia Jackson; former Carson Elementary assistant principal, Jeffrey McKenzie; and former Carson Elementary school nurse, Margaret McLaughlin (collectively, “the CPS Defendants”). The Plaintiffs also alleged against Jackson, McKenzie, and McLaughlin state law tort claims of wrongful death, intentional infliction of serious emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, loss of consortium, and failure to report child abuse. Additionally, the Plaintiffs brought a claim of spoliation against the Board, Ronan, Jackson, and McKenzie, as well as a claim of negligence against McLaughlin.

In lieu of filing an answer to the original complaint, the Board, Ronan, Jackson, and McKenzie moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ state law claims, in part on the grounds that they are entitled to governmental immunity pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2744. The district court denied the motion to dismiss on those grounds. On appeal, Jackson and McKenzie argue that they are entitled to governmental immunity with respect to the Plaintiffs’ state law claims because the amended complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to establish that their conduct was “reckless” as 1After briefing the motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs filed for leave to amend their complaint to include McLaughlin as a defendant, adding a negligence claim against her. The district court granted leave to amend at the same time that it granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss. The court accepted the amended complaint as the operative pleading and applied the motion to dismiss to it. Because we find that the Plaintiffs’ amended complaint sufficiently alleges facts that establish that Jackson and McKenzie behaved recklessly, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Jackson and McKenzie’s motion to dismiss, holding that they are not entitled to governmental immunity under Ohio Rev. Code § 2744.