CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PEDRO SILVESTRE-GREGORIO,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 19-5801
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville.
No. 2:18-cr-00155-1—J. Ronnie Greer, District Judge.
Argued: February 5, 2020
Decided and Filed: December 22, 2020
Before: BATCHELDER, LARSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Pedro Silvestre-Gregorio challenges his conviction for unlawful reentry of a removed alien by bringing a collateral attack against his underlying removal order from nineteen years ago. Silvestre-Gregorio alleges that the government violated his due-process rights at his 2001 removal proceeding by failing to provide him with counsel even though he was a juvenile at the time, and by failing to inform him that discretionary relief might be available. The district court rejected both claims and our precedent resolves each issue. Because this court has held that there is no constitutional right to government-provided counsel at civil removal proceedings and that an alien does not have a constitutional right to be informed of discretionary relief, we must AFFIRM.