|
CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT |
STEVE SNYDER-HILL; RONALD MCDANIEL; DAVID
MULVIN; WILLIAM BROWN; KURT HUNTSINGER;
WILLIAM RIEFFER; STEVE HATCH; KELLY REED;
MELVIN ROBINSON; DOUGLAS WELLS; JAMES KHALIL;
JERROLD L. SOLOMON; JOSEPH BECHTEL; MICHAEL
MURPHY; JOHN DAVID FALER; MATT MCCOY; GARY
AVIS; ROBERT SCHRINER; MICHAEL MONTGOMERY;
JOHN DOES 1–22, 25, 27, 29–37, 39–47, 49, 52, 54, 56–
60, 62–64, and 66–77 (21-3981); TIMOTHY MOXLEY;
RYAN CALLAHAN; JOHN JACKSON, JR.; JAMES
CARROLL; JEFFREY ROHDE; PATRICK MURRAY;
EVERETT ROSS; JOHN DOES 78–95 and 97–105 (21-
3991),
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant-Appellee. |
Nos. 21-3981/3991 |
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus;
Nos. 2:18-cv-00736 (21-3981); 2:21-cv-03838 (21-3991)—Michael H. Watson, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: December 14, 2022
Before: GUY, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.
_________________________
ORDER
_________________________
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the
petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered
upon the original submission and decision of the case. The petition then was circulated to the
full court. Less than a majority of the judges* voted in favor of rehearing en banc.
Therefore, the petition is denied.
Judge Guy would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent. |
|