MURPHY, Circuit Judge. In Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985), the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause requires states to provide psychiatric experts to indigent defendants who have a credible insanity defense. Id. at 74. Lisa Bergman relies on Ake to claim that she should have been provided an expert toxicologist at her criminal trial. The trial evidence showed that Bergman drove into an oncoming truck and killed its occupants. Scientists testified that she had prescription drugs in her system at the time of this crash (and at the time of several prior accidents), and the state’s expert opined that these drugs impaired her driving. A state court held that Ake did not require the state to provide Bergman with a defense toxicologist because she failed to show a sufficient need for one notwithstanding the state’s expert evidence. Bergman now argues that the state court misread Ake and misunderstood the record. In this federal case, however, she must meet the stringent standards for relief in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Given the Supreme Court’s lack of clarity over Ake’s scope, she has not done so. We affirm.