COLE, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Adam N. Berry alleged that Experian Information Solutions, a consumer reporting agency (CRA), negligently or willfully published inaccurate information in Berry’s consumer report that he owed spousal and child support. After Berry sent Experian court orders that allegedly demonstrated that he had no outstanding support obligations, Experian continued to report that the Michigan Office of Child Support (OCS) showed Berry had a balance due.

The district court granted Experian’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, reasoning that the FCRA required Experian to report any information received from OCS about Berry’s failure to pay support. Because Berry sufficiently pleaded that Experian did not adopt reasonable procedures to ensure maximum possible accuracy and did not reasonably reinvestigate Berry’s consumer report after he challenged its accuracy, we REVERSE.

LARSEN, Circuit Judge. Joel M. Guy, Jr. brutally murdered his parents with the calculated goal of collecting the proceeds of his mother’s insurance plans. He argues that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires that he receive those benefits. The district court disagreed, concluding either that ERISA does not preempt Tennessee’s slayer statute or that the federal common law prevents Guy from benefitting from his murders. Guy now appeals. We AFFIRM.