CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
HOWARD HAWKINS; DARIO HUNTER; JOSEPH R. DEMARE; BECCA CALHOUN; NATHANIEL LANE; BRETT JOSEPH; ANITA RIOS,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MIKE DEWINE; FRANK LAROSE; AMY ACTON,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 20-3717
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
No. 2:20-cv-02781—James L. Graham, District Judge.
Argued: July 27, 2020
Decided and Filed: August 3, 2020
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; SILER and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COLE, Chief Judge. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the State of Ohio issued a series of orders restricting in-person gatherings. But it left unchanged its ballot-access laws, which require candidates and minor political parties hoping to be listed on November’s ballot to show that they have a modicum of community support by collecting petition signatures from Ohio voters. The law requires that the signatures be collected in person, a task which has become more difficult in the era of social distancing. This case presents us with the question whether the State’s ballot-access requirements, as applied, have become unconstitutionally burdensome in light of the orders restricting in-person gatherings. Binding precedent compels us to conclude that they are not. We therefore affirm the district court.