CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
YOSAUN SMITH, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons and on behalf of Catholic Health Initiatives 401(k) Plan,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH a/k/a Catholic Health Initiatives; CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES RETIREMENT PLANS SUBCOMMITTEE; DOES 1–10,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 21-5964
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington.
No. 2:20-cv-00095—David L. Bunning, District Judge.
Argued: June 8, 2022
Decided and Filed: June 21, 2022
Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; KETHLEDGE and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

SUTTON, Chief Judge. Yosaun Smith claims that her retirement plan should have offered a different mix of fund options, in particular that it should have replaced actively managed mutual funds with passively managed mutual funds. But the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA for short, does not give the federal courts a broad license to second-guess the investment decisions of retirement plans. It instead supplies a cause of action only when retirement plan administrators breach a fiduciary duty by, say, offering imprudent investment options. Because Smith has not alleged facts from which a jury could plausibly infer that CommonSpirit breached any such duty and because Smith’s other claims do not get off the ground, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of her complaint.