CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
KEITH BERNARD SMITH,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NOAH NAGY, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
   No. 18-1751
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:11-cv-10261—Arthur J. Tarnow, District Judge.
Argued: April 29, 2020
Decided and Filed: June 15, 2020
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; SILER and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COLE, Chief Judge. Keith Bernard Smith, a Michigan prisoner, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that he is entitled to relief because: (1) the state court should have granted him a post-trial evidentiary hearing to determine whether the jury improperly relied on certain prejudicial information in rendering its verdict; (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict him; and (3) the state and district courts erred in refusing to consider new evidence that supports his innocence. Because none of Smith’s claims provides us a basis for exercising our limited authority to grant habeas relief to a state prisoner, we affirm the denial of the petition.