CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
SHASE HOWSE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. THOMAS HODOUS and BRIAN MIDDAUGH, individually and in their official capacities as employees of the City of Cleveland, Ohio; CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 19-3418
On Petition for Reharing En Banc
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
No. 1:17-cv-01714—Donald C. Nugent, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2020
COLE, Chief Judge; COOK and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
ORDER
_________________________

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petition then was circulated to the full court. Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
LUIS EDUARDO CUELLAR GARCIA,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
   No. 19-3489
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals;
No. A 209 003 936.
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2020
Before: MERRITT, THAPAR, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. Luis Eduardo Cuellar Garcia sought asylum in the United States. The question here is who should have decided his fate: an immigration judge or the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Garcia argues that the immigration judge lacked jurisdiction over his case. We disagree and deny his petition for review.