CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY; SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS; GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS; LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS; LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS,
Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents,
Defendant-Appellee,

COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conversation Coalition,
Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.
   No. 22-1946
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette.
No. 2:73-cv-00026—Paul Lewis Maloney, District Judge.
Argued: May 3, 2023
Decided and Filed: May 23, 2023
Before: BOGGS, McKEAGUE, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. For nearly three years, seven sovereigns have been embroiled in negotiations over who gets to manage the Great Lakes fisheries. The merits of those negotiations aren’t before us, only an antecedent question of civil procedure: is the Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources (“the Coalition”) entitled to intervene in those negotiations just as the parties are approaching a deal? Under our precedent, the answer is no. Because the district court properly denied the Coalition’s motion to intervene, we affirm.