CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
DONALD MACHAN, an individual and as next friend of his daughter, T.R.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SHAWN OLNEY, individually,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 18-1691
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
No. 1:17-cv-00450—Robert J. Jonker, District Judge.
Argued: October 24, 2019
Decided and Filed: May 14, 2020
Before: KETHLEDGE, BUSH, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. Shawn Olney, a police officer assigned to a middle school, heard from the school’s principal that a student, T.R., had told the principal that she had been contemplating suicide for about a month. Based on that report, Olney took T.R. to a nearby hospital for a mental evaluation. T.R.’s father, Donald Machan, claims that Olney violated his and T.R.’s constitutional rights in doing so. On appeal, Machan now concedes what he disputed in the district court: that T.R. had indeed told her principal that she had been contemplating suicide—as a video from the hospital visit makes clear. We hold that Olney was entitled to summary judgment on Machan’s claims, and reverse the district court’s decision to the contrary.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
ENCHANT CHRISTMAS LIGHT MAZE & MARKET LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GLOWCO, LLC; EXHIBAU US, LLC; PATRICK WALLAIN; CHRIS STACEY,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 19-6282
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
No. 3:19-cv-00966—Aleta Arthur Trauger, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: May 14, 2020
Before: GILMAN, DONALD, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

LARSEN, Circuit Judge. Enchant Christmas Light Maze & Market Ltd. (“Enchant”) sought a preliminary injunction against Glowco, LLC and its operator Chris Stacey, and against Exhibau US, LLC and its operator Patrick Wallain (collectively “Glowco”). Enchant sought to enjoin Glowco from further infringing Enchant’s copyrights in a number of holiday light sculptures. The district court denied Enchant’s request. Enchant appealed and, for the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.