CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
VINCENT D. WHITE, JR.,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL PHILLIPS, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
   No. 21-3546
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
No. 2:17-cv-00325—James L. Graham, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: April 27, 2023
Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; LARSEN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

LARSEN, Circuit Judge. Vincent White, Jr., a state prisoner, sought federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied his petition but granted a certificate of appealability on a single issue: whether White had shown that his attorney was laboring under a conflict of interest that required automatic reversal of White’s conviction. White’s claim depends on facts outside the state court record, so the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shinn v. Ramirez, 142 S. Ct. 1718 (2022), likely precludes relief. But even if we could consider the new facts introduced in federal habeas court, White’s claim fails. White’s attorney informed White of the facts underlying the purported conflict of interest, and White did not object. So White was required to show that the alleged conflict adversely affected counsel’s performance. White has not made such a showing, so we AFFIRM.