Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
No. 3:19-cv-00332—William Lynn Campbell, Jr., District Judge.
Argued: January 13, 2022
Decided and Filed: April 22, 2022
Before: GIBBONS, ROGERS, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.
_________________________
OPINION
_________________________
NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. Delek, a fuel producer, contends that it overpaid its
income taxes and seeks a refund. The IRS counters that what Delek really wants to do is double
dip. Delek earned a tax credit by mixing renewables into its products. Since that credit applies
against the fuel excise tax, Delek ended up paying less in excise taxes. But Delek insists it
should be deemed to have paid the full, unreduced amount of excise tax. Why would it say that?
When calculating its gross income, a producer can include its excise tax liability in its cost of
goods sold. And a higher cost of goods sold means a lower gross income, which means a lower
income tax liability.
To that end, Delek offers a novel theory: The credit is a “payment” that satisfies, but does
not reduce, its excise tax liability. But the statute’s plain meaning says otherwise, and we
AFFIRM summary judgment in the government’s favor. |