CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
REBECCA STAMPE,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 19-6293
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga.
No. 1:18-cr-00016-1—Harry S. Mattice, Jr., District Judge.
Argued: January 27, 2021
Decided and Filed: April 20, 2021
Before: BOGGS, SUTTON, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. The government charged Rebecca Stampe and Michael Loden with conspiring to distribute at least 500 grams of methamphetamine. Stampe pled guilty and agreed to cooperate with the government in its case against Loden. Loden did not plead guilty. Before Stampe’s sentencing and Loden’s trial, however, the government dropped Loden’s case after “discover[ing] circumstances apart from evidence of . . . guilt which prevent[ed] . . . moving forward.” (R. 71, PageID 289.)

The government told Stampe that Loden’s dismissal did not affect its case against her, even though they were co-conspirators, and the dismissal related to inappropriate conduct by a confidential informant. Unsatisfied with that answer, Stampe made two motions. First, she moved the district court to compel the government to disclose the information that led to the dismissal of her co-defendant’s conspiracy charge or to review that evidence in camera. Second, she moved to withdraw from her plea agreement, which she says was premised in part on her ability to testify against Loden in exchange for a more lenient sentencing recommendation from the government.

Relying on government representations both that the informant’s misconduct happened after Stampe’s arrest and that the government had complied with disclosure obligations, the district court denied Stampe’s motion for production or review. It also denied her motion to withdraw from her plea agreement. We AFFIRM.