CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
ANITA CAGAYAT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
   No. 19-3431
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
No. 2:18-cv-01172—Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., District Judge.
Decided and Filed: March 9, 2020
Before: NORRIS, MOORE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Anita Cagayat seeks an order from this Court reversing the district court’s dismissal of her claim brought pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(8) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and remanding the matter back to the district court. The district court dismissed Cagayat’s Fair Debt Collection Practices Act allegation for failure to state a plausible claim to relief, reasoning that the exhibits attached to her complaint contradict the factual allegations therein that are central to the claim. Because we find that the exhibits Cagayat attached to her complaint do not utterly discredit the factual allegations central to her 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(8) claim and because those factual allegations give rise to a plausible violation of § 1692f(8), we reverse the district court’s holding and remand the matter for reconsideration in light of this opinion.