CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
DANIEL VANDERKODDE; SUSAN BUCK; RUBY ROBINSON; ANITA BECKLEY; RITCHIE SWAGERTY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees (19-1091/1127/1128),
v.
MARY JANE M. ELLIOTT, P.C. (19-1091/1127); BERNDT & ASSOCIATES, P.C. (19-1091/1128),
Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

LVNV FUNDING, LLC; MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC; MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.; ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees (19-1091).
   Nos. 19-1091/1127/1128
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
No. 1:17-cv-00203—Paul Lewis Maloney, District Judge.
Argued: January 29, 2020
Decided and Filed: February 26, 2020
Before: GUY, SUTTON, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

In Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., the Supreme Court made clear that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine—which prohibits the lower federal courts from reviewing appeals of state-court decisions—applies only to an exceedingly narrow set of cases. 544 U.S. 280 (2005). This putative class action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Michigan consumer laws “is not the rare one that threads the Rooker-Feldman needle.” Van Hoven v. Buckles & Buckles, P.L.C., 947 F.3d 889, 892 (6th Cir. 2020). We therefore reverse its dismissal on Rooker-Feldman grounds and remand for further proceedings.