CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
MELANIE PELCHA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MW BANCORP, INC.; WATCH HILL BANK,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 20-3511
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati.
No. 1:17-cv-00497—Douglas Russell Cole, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: January 12, 2021
Before: SUHRHEINRICH, McKEAGUE, and READLER, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Melanie Pelcha was an employee of Watch Hill Bank (“Watch Hill”) and its holding company MW Bancorp Inc. until she was terminated for refusing to turn in a time-off request form. Pelcha alleges that she was terminated on the basis of her age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). The district court dismissed her claims on summary judgment. We see no error in the district court’s decision and AFFIRM.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
E. A. C. A.,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
   No. 20-3216
On Petition for Review from the Board of Immigration Appeals;
No. A 209 885 750.
Argued: December 2, 2020
Decided and Filed: January 12, 2021
Before: MOORE, GILMAN, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. E.A. C.A. (“E.A.”) petitions this court for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen an in absentia removal order. Because the BIA abused its discretion in concluding that E.A. had not established that exceptional circumstances justified her failure to appear, we GRANT the petition for review, VACATE the removal order, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.