BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. Following two days of evidence, two days of deliberations, and two composed juries, defendant appellant Anthony Ozomaro was convicted of possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). On appeal, Ozomaro seeks a new trial based on assertions of improper removal and replacement of a deliberating juror or, in the alternative, a new sentencing hearing due to an allegedly improper sentencing enhancement. For the following reasons, we affirm.

CHAD A. READLER, Circuit Judge. Hackers compromised customer-payment information at several Wendy’s franchisee restaurants. That difficulty for Wendy’s and its franchisees soon became a difficulty for the company’s directors and officers, when a number of shareholders took legal action against Wendy’s directors and officers on the corporation’s behalf to remedy any wrongdoing that might have allowed the breach to occur. Three shareholder derivative legal efforts ensued—two actions and one pre-suit demand—leading to a series of mediation sessions between the interested parties. Two of the efforts resulted in a settlement, which the district court approved after appointing one of the settling shareholder’s attorneys as the lead counsel. Those decisions drew unsuccessful objections from Thomas Caracci, a shareholder who had been pursuing one of the derivative actions, but had not participated in the latest settlement discussions. Caracci now appeals a host of decisions made by the district court, which together had the effect of dramatically reducing Caracci’s entitlement to an attorney’s fees award. Because the court acted within the bounds of its wide discretion to manage shareholder litigation, we affirm.

LARSEN, Circuit Judge. For almost a decade, executives at FCA US, LLC and its parent company, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.,¹ engaged in a pattern of racketeering, involving bribery and corrupt labor relations with the United Auto Workers (UAW). General Motors (GM) believes that it was the intended victim of the scheme and says it has suffered billions of dollars in damages because of it. GM accordingly sued FCA, Fiat, and various executives under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The district court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss, concluding that GM had failed to establish that the alleged RICO violations proximately caused its injuries. For the reasons stated, we AFFIRM.