SUTTON, Chief Judge. In the course of a law enforcement encounter involving two individuals—an officer and a fleeing suspect—two dogs became the victims. Searching for a gun discarded by the suspect in a chase through a neighborhood, an officer used a trained dog, Roky, to find the gun. As they walked along a fence surrounding a yard, another dog, a pit bull named Chino, lurched through the fence, bit Roky, and would not release him. After a struggle and plenty of yelling and yelping, the officer shot and killed Chino. A federal constitutional claim came next. Lamentable though the incident was for dog and owner, no constitutional violation occurred. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the officer and the City of Detroit.

JOHN K. BUSH, Circuit Judge. Reform America, a nonprofit corporation that does business as Created Equal, is an organization that engages in anti-abortion protests. To that end, the group and its founder, Mark Harrington, sought to demonstrate at the Democratic Party’s presidential-primary debates in Detroit, Michigan, in the summer of 2019. In response to security concerns, however, the Detroit Police Department (“DPD”) imposed and enforced several measures that impeded the group’s speech. A “restricted area” blocked access to the debate venue’s immediate vicinity. Protestors were divided into “right-leaning” and “left-leaning” camps and were barred from commingling. And Harrington himself was even briefly detained after a confrontation with police.

Fed up with the speech restrictions, Harrington and his group eventually abandoned the site for good. They also filed a federal complaint alleging violations of the First and Fourth Amendments and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. But the district court granted summary judgment to defendants—the City of Detroit and three individual officers—reasoning that no constitutional violations occurred. Likewise discerning no violations, we affirm.