CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KEITA JERROD HAYDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 23-5571
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington.
No. 5:06-cr-00187-1—Danny C. Reeves, Chief District Judge.
Decided and Filed: May 20, 2024
Before: BATCHELDER, THAPAR, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. For violating the terms of his supervised release a second time, the district court imposed upon Keita Jerrod Hayden a seven-month term of incarceration followed by an eight-year term of supervised release. The district court imposed mandatory and standard supervised-release conditions by reference and imposed special conditions by orally pronouncing them at Hayden’s sentencing. Hayden challenges his supervised-release term on two grounds: first, that it is longer than his statute of conviction allows, and second, that the district court violated his right to be present at sentencing by imposing the mandatory and standard conditions by reference. Because the district court did not exceed the statutory-maximum term of supervised release and because it did provide Hayden with sufficient notice of the conditions to satisfy due process, we affirm the judgment.