ROGERS, Circuit Judge. In this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, relator USN4U alleges that Wolf Creek Federal Services and several of its employees submitted falsely inflated project estimates to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for facilities maintenance projects to be performed by Wolf Creek, resulting in the negotiation of fraudulently induced, exorbitant contract prices. Relying in part on NASA’s subsequent decision to pay the invoices and continue to contract with Wolf Creek, and on the Government’s decision not to intervene in USN4U’s claim, the district court dismissed the suit for failure to allege that Wolf Creek’s work order proposals were materially false or caused NASA to pay the allegedly exorbitant prices. USN4U’s amended complaint, however, adequately alleged fraud, notwithstanding NASA’s later contractual decisions and the fact that the Government declined to intervene.

. . .

USN4U has accordingly stated a plausible claim under the FCA. We of course take no position on whether, following appropriate discovery, summary judgment would be warranted for failing to show a genuine issue of material fact. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.