CLAY, Circuit Judge. In 2017, Plaintiff Euna McGruder sued Defendant Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (“Metro Nashville”) in United States District Court for retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000, et seq. In 2021, a jury awarded McGruder $260,000 for her claim, and the district court ordered Metro Nashville to reinstate her to her previous position. Metro Nashville appeals the district court’s reinstatement order and argues that the entirety of McGruder’s claims—including the jury award—should be barred by judicial estoppel due to her failure to disclose her cause of action against Metro Nashville when she filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2018. However, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Metro Nashville’s judicial estoppel claims as applied to non-final, non-appealable orders that are not before this Court. And the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering McGruder’s reinstatement, which, as an equitable remedy, is not barred by judicial estoppel. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s reinstatement order and otherwise DISMISS Metro Nashville’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DAVIS, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Katrina Robinson, founder and director of The Healthcare Institute (“THI”), of four counts of wire fraud for actions she took in administering a federal grant the organization received from 2015–2019. Robinson filed a post-verdict motion for a judgment of acquittal (“JOA”) on all four counts. The district court granted the motion as to two of the counts. In these consolidated appeals, the government challenges the court’s grant of JOA on one of those counts, and Robinson appeals the denial of JOA on the remaining two counts. Robinson also appeals the district court’s denial of her oral motion for mistrial with prejudice and her motion for a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

PER CURIAM. An administrative law judge denied Keeley Hamilton’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income because, despite her physical impairments, she could still work in two occupations. On appeal, Hamilton relies on Ninth Circuit caselaw to seek a categorical rule that would treat her as disabled unless she could work in at least three occupations. We disagree with the Ninth Circuit’s rule. So we affirm the district court’s decision upholding the Social Security Administration’s denial of benefits to Hamilton.

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. At the conclusion of a jury trial, Joshua Aldridge was found guilty of conspiracy to sex traffic an adult by force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion, among other charges. Thereafter, the district court sentenced him to 324 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Aldridge challenges the district court’s denial of his Rule 29 motion and the district court’s application of two sentencing enhancements. For the reasons explained below, we AFFIRM the district court.