CHAD A. READLER, Circuit Judge. Gerald Lynn Campbell brandished a pistol and told a group of laborers that he had a bullet for each of them. Following an indictment, Campbell pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment, concluding that Campbell’s prior convictions for robbery and drug offenses triggered the Armed Career Criminal Act’s mandatory minimum. Campbell appealed, challenging his sentence. We affirm.

BOGGS, Circuit Judge. International Outdoor, Inc. (“International Outdoor”) sought permission to erect billboards in the City of Troy. After the City denied International Outdoor’s permit application and request for a variance, International Outdoor sued, claiming that the City’s sign ordinance (“Ordinance”) violated the First Amendment. International Outdoor argued that the Ordinance’s variance procedure imposed an invalid prior restraint and that its permit exceptions were content-based restrictions on free speech.

In a prior appeal, we affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the City on International Outdoor’s prior-restraint claim. But we reversed the district court’s dismissal of the content-based-restriction claim and remanded for the court to consider whether the Ordinance, with the permit exceptions, survived strict scrutiny. While it does not, the permit exceptions are, as the district court held on remand, severable, leaving intact the Ordinance’s height, size, and setback requirements. Because International Outdoor’s proposed billboards do not satisfy these valid, content-neutral standards, we affirm.

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. In January 2019, Officer Christopher Mannella fatally shot James Burroughs at an apartment complex in Niles, Ohio. On behalf of Burroughs’s estate, Timothy Raimey brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against the City of Niles and several involved police officers. The Defendants moved for summary judgment, which Raimey did not oppose except as to his claims against Mannella. The district court granted summary judgment to the other Defendants but denied Mannella’s assertions of qualified and state law immunity, allowing Raimey’s claims of excessive force, wrongful death, assault and battery, and reckless conduct, to proceed against Mannella. Mannella timely appealed. We deny Raimey’s motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the denial of qualified immunity to Mannella.

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. In 2011, Nickless Whitson participated in two Hobbs Act robberies. He was charged with and convicted of eight crimes at trial and sentenced to 1,252 months of incarceration. After several appeals, through which four of his convictions were vacated, he was resentenced in May of 2022 to 360 months of incarceration. Whitson contends that his sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable. He argues that the district court made four errors: first, it speculated that Whitson’s difficult upbringing made him more likely to reoffend, in spite of evidence to the contrary; second, it failed to make an “individualized assessment” of Whitson’s background; third, it impermissibly required Whitson to admit his guilt in order to consider fully evidence of his rehabilitation while incarcerated; and fourth, it did not properly weigh the evidence of his rehabilitation. We conclude that the district court committed plain error by requiring Whitson to admit his guilt in order to consider fully the evidence of his rehabilitation. We therefore VACATE Whitson’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.