CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT

GEOFFREY N. FIEGER; FIEGER, FIEGER, KENNEY & JOHNSON, P.C.; JOHN L. BARLOW; J.L. BARLOW AND ASSOCIATES ADVERTISING, INC.; BILL MILLER; NANCY FISCHER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MICHAEL A. COX; STEPHEN J. MARKMAN; TERRI LYNN LAND; THOMAS J. CAMERON; DOUG BAKER; DONOVAN MOTLEY,
Defendants-Appellees.


No. 07-1103

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 05-73891—Lawrence P. Zatkoff, District Judge.
Argued: March 21, 2008
Decided and Filed: May 6, 2008
Before: MARTIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; STAMP, District Judge.

_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Geoffrey N. Fieger, John L. Barlow, Bill Miller, Nancy Fisher, the law firm of Fieger, Fieger & Johnson, and the J.L. Barlow advertising firm brought a vindictive prosecution action against Michigan Attorney General Michael Cox, Michigan Supreme Court Justice Stephen J. Markman, Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Rand, and others in the Michigan Attorney General’s office. The district court found that the Younger abstention doctrine counseled against exercising jurisdiction where essentially the same issues were being raised in a state court proceeding, and dismissed each of the plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs now appeal. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.


CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT

GHAZI ZOARAB,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,
Respondent.


No. 07-3624

On Petition for Review of a Decision
of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
No. A79 290 728.
Argued: April 22, 2008
Decided and Filed: May 6, 2008
Before: GILMAN, ROGERS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. In this asylum case, Ghazi Zoarab asks the court to give controlling weight to the unique circumstances of the monarchical government in the United Arab Emirates (the “U.A.E.”), where any expression against the integrity of a royal family member is said to constitute political expression. Contrary to Zoarab’s contention, however, there is little in the record to suggest that his comments about a soured business deal with a prince amounted to political speech. Accordingly, we deny his petition for review.